THE NEW REPUBLICAN NEWSLETTER No. 68 (September 30, 2008) ------------------------------------------------------------ AN INTERNATIONAL MONEY CARTEL Yes, I touched on this in my last Special Edition Newsletter - and took a lot of heat from people who thought I was "some kind of conspiracy freak." Well, I am not getting these comments any longer. Not after the Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, AIG, and Merrill Lynch bailouts. Yes, these were bailouts. But what happened to Lehman Brothers? This was not a bankrupt company? It just ran into a short-term liquidity problem. But suddenly it was in trouble. Everybody blamed the "short sellers" who supposedly drove it into the ground. So there was a stop put on "short selling." Then, along comes a bank and buys up Lehman Brothers. If it was such a bad deal - and going bankrupt - then why would anybody in their right mind buy up Lehman Brothers? Because it was VERY profitable to do so. And who bought out Lehman? J.P. Morgan Bank. This is extremely curious to say the least. J.P. Morgan loaned money and made billions on the 1908 banking crisis. Then J.P. Morgan loaned the U.S. Government money in World War II and made another bundle of cash. Now Wall Street is saying that there will only be a few big banks remaining after all this is over - Bank of America, Citibank, Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs and J.P. Morgan. Oddly enough, the men that have been in control of the REAL money have been involved with one bank in particular, Goldman Sachs - and yes, Goldman Sachs has just stated that it is a "bank" again. All of the following have had very close association with this institution: Robert Rubin - Treasury Secretary Alan Greenspan - Fed Chairman Henry Paulson - Treasury Secretary Warren Buffett - Just invested 5 BILLION dollars into Goldman Sachs Every one of these men have direct or indirect ties with the Bilderberg Group, the Tri-Lateral Commission and/or the Council on Foreign Relations. Still sound like a coincidence? I restate my belief that we have all been duped into thinking that this battle is between Democrats and Republicans. But that is not the case. That is the "red herring" of this political circus that we are now witnessing. Politics has nothing to do with it. Money has everything to do with it. Money - and POWER. I was recently asked why both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama were invited to the Bilderberg Group's most recent meeting in Virginia - but not John McCain. The Bilderberg Group cannot control John McCain - but they can control Barack Obama. Enter Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Both organizations were bailed out by the U.S. Government. Both were headed by men who are now directly involved in Obama's campaign. Both men made millions of dollars while the stock of both companies plummeted. Enter Chicago style politics - and Barack Obama. The finances for his campaign are coming from PRIVATE contributors - tons of money from none other than Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and a host of other billionaires. This sounds exactly like what the Democrats have been accusing the Republicans of for years. John McCain is taking public financing - and is thus, not controlled by the Chicago political machine - or the political financiers of the Bilderberg Group, nor any other affiliated associations. And this is the crux of the situation. It is NOT politics. It is POWER and MONEY. Obama is the Chicago Political Machine Hack. And Joe Biden is the man put into place to keep an eye on the Machine's investment - a Senator who has been in Washington for approximately 30 years. This is change? No, this is Chicago politics at its best. John McCain may be our last hope before America experiences real CHANGE - change that it had no intention of embracing, but was misled by a charlatan in Democratic clothing. If Bill Clinton was a Spinmeister - then Barack Obama is the Chicago Machine's Spinmeister Supreme. Like the old saying goes, "Be careful what you wish for. It just might come true." History does not repeat itself; We the People do. For those of you interested in pursuing the Bilderberg Group I have added links to two Internet pages that might help get you started. Happy reading! http://www.apfn.org/apfn/bilderberg.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bilderberg_attendees ------------------------------------------------------------ REPUBLICAN TED STEVENS TRIAL TO BEGIN - ALLEGED CORRUPTION Republican Ted Stevens is set to go to trial soon for his alleged lying about receiving gifts from an oil company. This case might even include Colin Powell and Ted Kennedy as witnesses. It also has a sex scandal brewing beneath the surface involving an underage girl. Remember, this is a Republican - and he is going to trial. ------------------------------------------------------------ DEMOCRAT CHARLES RANGEL - UNPAID TAXES Charles Rangel has been forced to pay back taxes that he "forgot" to report on $75,000 rental income for the years 2004, 2005, and 2006 totaling approximately $11,000 in back taxes. "Forgot to report" his taxes? This man is responsible for writing major parts of our tax code. If you or I told the IRS that we "forgot" to report for three year in a row we would be laughed right into jail. It remains to be seen if Charles Rangle will be charged with tax fraud. Remember, this is a Democrat - and he is not going to trial - yet. Let's see if there really is a double standard here - or if it is just my "conspiracy" imagination running amok. ------------------------------------------------------------ THREE MORE PREDICTIONS I am reminded by a faithful reader that my predictions are still in the 80% range, so I am going to stick my neck out a little farther. Prediction #1: I bet that the government will have a money bailout for the companies that ripped off the average taxpayer by the end of this week at the latest. I think that the confidence of these "monied people" was temporarily shaken the other day. Nancy Polosi was so sure of herself that she was astoundingly arrogant in her speech before the vote was taken. It reminded me of the definition of liberal: A liberal is a person who talks you into sharing your lunch with them; then makes you feel guilty for doing so. Instead of Nancy Polosi actually being bi-partisan when she should have been, she let her emotion get in the way of her duty to country and engaged in a not so subtle political form of revenge. I cringed when I heard her speak. I knew before she finished that the votes were not going to be there. Again, it reminded me of an ancient Chinese maxim: Vengeance is like a double-edged sword - without a handle. Now that the backroom dealing has been done, again in secret, I think a bailout is in order - and will be passed sometime this week - hopefully before Thursday night's debate between Biden and Palin. Prediction #2: If there actually is a deal struck, John McCain is going to come out the winner in all of this. Remember, Harry Reed came out a few days ago, spitting venom that John McCain had ruined a deal that was just about to be set in place. Well, the truth is that there was not a deal in hand. And the Republicans were being left out of the whole process - unti the MAVERICK McCain stepped in and screwed things up. Good for John McCain. He stopped a horribly flawed bailout that had too many riders to go into at this point. But, suffice it to say, McCain put a stop to a bad bailout - and has brokered another bill, that is still a bailout - but not quite so bad, much to the consternation of the Democrats - and their billionaire backers. Prediction #3: Sarah Palin will surprise everyone in the debate and both her, and John McCain's, ratings will spike. I know this is a very hard call - but I have a gut feeling that Biden is in for a very rough time. I just hope Governor Palin remembers to wear her lipstick. ------------------------------------------------------------ AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST - THE EVANGELICAL ELEMENT If this group of individuals doesn't shut up - and shut up fast - they will be the ones who ultimately hand victory to the Democrats in November. With their idiotic insertions that Pro-Choice equals Pro-Abortion and their constant harping on the theme of Anti-Homosexual Rights, the Evangelical Element will be held fully responsible for the Republicans losing the election in November - if indeed, they are defeated I implore all Evangelicals - if you really care about the future of this country - and the destiny of America - please refrain from even mentioning these two subjects, at least until the election is over. Every time these two topics come up, the Republican party loses more support from the Log Cabin Republicans - and thousands of Hillary supporters to boot. Sarah Palin does not bash her beliefs into the faces of other people - and neither should the Evangelical Element. But if the Evangelicals - who were thrown out of the Dixiecrat Party and later the Democrat Party as well - refuse to muzzle themselves, and if McCain loses as a result of these people - then I would call on all fair-minded Republicans to ask the Evangelical Element to leave the Republican Party - and to never return. The Evangelical Element has done more harm than they have ever done good to the Republican Party - and they should quietly go somewhere else and form their own political organization. In closing this issue of the New Republican Newsletter, I am reminded of a quote by Mark Twain that went like this: "I have met all sorts of Evangelicals who are totally convinced that they are going directly to Heaven. Well, if that is the case, I am not sure I want to go there myself." Best wishes and enjoy the debate on Thursday. Larry Klepinger Still, A New Republican Your ideas and comments are more than welcome. Many thanks again for taking the time and effort to read the New Republican Newsletter. ------------------------------------------------------------ If you wish to no longer receive this e-newsletter, please e-mail me directly at: lawrenceklepinger@gmail.com